Infrastructure for research

Scholarly publishing as one connected workflow

One environment for authors, journal editorial offices and institutions: manuscript screening for originality and machine-generated text, preparation to journal guidelines, journal selection, submission, peer review and issue production.

Author workspace

For authors

A manuscript studio: screening, preparation to journal guidelines, journal selection and submission. The English-language edition of the workspace is in preparation.

Screen a manuscriptSelect a journalSubmit to an editorial office
Editorial cabinet

For editorial offices

An editorial cabinet for the full cycle: submissions with screening reports, peer review, issue production and metadata exports. The journal keeps its own procedure and policy.

Receive manuscripts with reportsRun the peer reviewAssemble issues and exports
Institutional account

For institutions

An institutional account for monitoring publication activity, screening manuscripts before they leave the organisation and running the institution's own journals.

See publicationsReview author activityPrepare reports

See how it works

Three scenarios: for an author, a journal editorial office and an organisation. Choose yours.

Step 1 of 4 · Incoming manuscriptsAll submissions in one list: metadata collected, statuses and deadlines visible at once.
asnap.io/demo/editorial
Incoming manuscripts
12New
7In review
5Ready for issue
Inboxtoday
Digital platforms in the regional economyNovak A.New
Models of sustainable development of small townsSmith O.Tech check
Cluster policy and innovationKim E.Review
Investment attractiveness of regionsOrlova M.To issue
Demonstration with illustrative data: this is how work in an ASNAP cabinet looks.

How it works

  1. 1A manuscript is screenedOriginality with attributed sources, share of machine-generated text, compliance with the chosen journal’s requirements. The author and the editorial office see the same report.
  2. 2It is prepared and submittedText, metadata and references are formatted to the journal’s guidelines; the author selects a journal from the catalogue and submits from the workspace.
  3. 3The editorial office works in its cabinetDecisions, reviewers, deadlines and correspondence with authors; issue composition and export of metadata to indexing services.

Our position on machine-generated text

ASNAP measures the share of machine-generated text in a manuscript and reports it to the author and the editorial office alike. The platform does not rewrite texts to evade detection and does not offer such services. The method is documented, and every party sees the same report.

Integrated with ASNAP
ORCIDDOICrossrefDOAJERIH PLUSGoogle ScholarASNAP originality screeningMachine-text assessment